News

A Qualitative Analysis On and Lessons Learned From Maryland’s Purple Line

Written By

  • Nicholas Finio, Associate Director of NCSG
  • Dominique Gebru, Transportation Planner at Washington DC Department of Transportation
  • Katy June-Friesen, Associate Director of Communications & Research for the Small Business Anti-Displacement Network
  • Gerrit-Jan Knaap, Professor of Urban Studies and Planning at the University of Maryland and PLCC Chair

Transit-oriented development (TOD) represents a promising form of development in urban transit corridors offering walkable communities, reduced car dependence, and enhanced access to opportunities. But all too often, the benefits of new transit investments are overshadowed by rising housing costs and the displacement of long-time residents and small businesses. What if there was a way to ensure that these investments truly benefit everyone, especially those most vulnerable to displacement?

Our recent analysis of the Purple Line Corridor Coalition (PLCC) in Maryland reveals a powerful strategy: leveraging multi-sector community collaborations to promote equitable development in transit corridors. By bringing together diverse stakeholders and focusing on community needs, these coalitions can play a crucial role in shaping a more just and sustainable future.

Read more at Urban Affairs Review

Abstract

The State of Maryland, through a public-private partnership, is building a new light rail line called the Purple Line. This project will greatly increase transit accessibility and increase land values in neighborhoods where many minority, low-income residents and small business owners may be vulnerable to displacement. The Purple Line Corridor Coalition (PLCC) was established in 2013 to balance equitable transit-oriented development against potential for displacement. In this paper, we analyze the structure, activities, and performance of the PLCC. Through a qualitative analysis lens based on collective impact theory, community coalition theory, collective impact regionalism, and community-based action research, we discuss whether and how it is possible for a multi-sectoral community coalition to influence equitable development outcomes before a planned transit line is operational. These findings, we suggest, offer useful lessons for others trying to promote equitable transit oriented development, or other forms of community development, though multi-sectoral community coalitions.

 

 

Oct 21Wideleine DesirComments Disabled